In articles, magazines and books, it is often only a question of how the applicant should write a successful application and should present himself best in the interview. However, the poor handling of many companies is unfortunately excluded, even with well-qualified applicants. If you are looking for companies that do not know how to deal with applicants and how you can avoid the disappointment of applicants beforehand, read here.
Quite a few applicants report negative things that they did in the application process : Documents are not returned, or if, after repeated requests, and then also frequently the documents of another applicant, properly compiled documents are sent back with kinks and stains, no reaction of the enterprise or if, after many months, disgraceful, impolite treatment of In the interview, which no longer falls under the "Stress Interview" category.
Some companies wishing to use postal applications should point out directly in their job announcement that the return of the documents is only possible
Apart from the fact that it used to be commonplace and is still practiced by many companies so far, the documents are returned to the applicant at their own expense especially when unemployed applicants also have the financial aspect, because if the candidate is to pay not only the cost of the application portfolio, the application photo, copies of the certificates, envelope and postage for the dispatch, but also the postage and the envelope for the return Sum, which is simply not financially affordable for many unemployed people
And even if someone were to apply for an unsubsidized employment relationship and have sufficient financial resources, the additional costs for the provision of return and postage would also be inadequate.
No appreciation from the company
This kind of dealings with companies with applicants shows, on the one hand, that the applicant and their documents are more likely to be an annoying evil and, on the other hand, that the financial position of the company is also ordered by the applicants
It is also unlikely that applications will be sent to companies that have been included in their advertisement from the outset, that the applicant should not send any elaborate folders, as his / her documents are not interesting for the company anyway.
Presentation talks, which are time-consuming for the applicant
Besides a series of discussion talks, which led rather in the form of a stressinterview , there are, unfortunately, many negative examples in which the employer does not have a productive conversation and can not be interpreted as a stress interview. Examples:
- A medium-sized applicant, who had applied for an assistant position in the backoffice and had thus not even had customer contact, was asked in the interview about whether she did not agree that she was at least
- An applicant, who appeared ten minutes too early – on time – to the presentation date, was referred by the staff chief of the office, as punctuality in her eyes was obviously an over-rated criterion.
- There is certainly no objection to the fact that the person asking the applicant to wait a few minutes outside because he has other urgent tasks to do but to throw out the candidate correctly and give him his virtues like Punctuality and reliability are not justified.
- Dialogue opening with a competition
How can you avoid such disappointing courses as applicants?
Apart from the above, Criteria, which can already be found in the job advertisements, may also be useful for your own research before applying for an application. Since most companies present on their homepages and their brochures from their chocolate side, it is recommended to search in the Internet where, for example, former employees comment on evaluation portals to this employer or talk with friends, neighbors or acquaintances, who have worked there or once worked. Sometimes you make your own research in the run-up, whether an application with the respective company is worthwhile or not.
Picture credits: imtmphoto / stock.adobe.com
PS: Qualitätsmanagement ist
Please let us know how you like our article. Please click on the asterisks below (5 stars = very good):